Thursday, June 10, 2021

Commission rejects "smoke and mirrors" argument that knee injury at work arose out of employment from "walking"

 Jamie Overstreet v TAMKO Building 

Release date:  June 8, 2021 (Feb. 2018) 

Venue: Joplin

summary:  Claimant alleges injuries to the left knee from twisting while walking on a level surface and his knee surgery flowed from the accident.  Claimant failed to show that changing directions while walking was a hazard he would not have equally encountered outside of work to establish a work related risk arising out of employment.  Claimant acknowledged similar exposure of walking on asphalt and changing directions in public parking lots while shopping and failed in his burden of persuasion from "smoke and mirrors" testimony  that walking over "more" uneven surfaces at work or wearing boots contributed to an increased risk hazard. 


Cast 

Fisher

Peterson

Sparlin 

Koprivica 

Comments    An operations manager testified  regarding his personal knowledge of the condition of the place of the alleged accident and similar asphalt lots in he community and opined there was no material difference. 

The dissent felt claimant established increased hazard through cracked, uneven, inclined and low lit asphalt surface.