Monday, March 1, 2021

No award for disputed medical bills without notice of need for care

 Justin Kent v NHC Healthcare

Release Date:  2-2-2021  (Accident date Dec. 2008)

Venue:  ED   108667

Plot summary:  Claimant sought a claim of PTD benefits, past medical bills and TTD and he was awarded PPD only.  He appealed.  The court affirms and found sufficient evidence to support a PPD award and no foundation of notice of a need for medical care to award the medical bills before he proceeded to have a microdiscectomy and later a fusion.   The ALJ had excluded various expert reports used in conjunction with a disability claim. 

The ALJ awarded 35% to the spine.  It note: 

"Only after his termination by NHC Healthcare did Kent embark on a long, expensive, and at times questionable path seeking medical treatment for back pain Kent associates with his workplace injuries. Kent’s journey involved multiple physicians and medical professionals offering varied diagnoses and treatments. The record unambiguously shows that at no time while Kent sought medical care and treatment from Dr. Parks or anyone else, did Kent make any demand on NHC Healthcare or notify NHC Healthcare of his desire to continue medical treatment with these professionals. To the contrary, the record clearly shows that Kent intentionally declined to notify NHC Healthcare of his intent to seek continuing medical care for his reported back pain following his termination of employment. The record supports the Commission’s finding that Kent knowingly incurred medical care and treatment after his March 2009 termination at his own expense. See Section 287.140.1. The record reveals that Kent did not request any additional medical treatment from NHC Healthcare because he did not think 24 NHC Healthcare would assist him. Whether Kent was correct in his assessment of how NHC Healthcare might react to a post-termination request for medical care is strictly a matter of speculation and inconsequential to our review as the record before us clearly shows Kent never asked for medical treatment from NHC Healthcare after March 2009. Nevertheless, Kent argues the Commission is obligated to order NHC Healthcare to pay the medical expenses Kent incurred while directing his own course of treatment because NHC Healthcare had notice of his need for additional treatment. We are not persuaded."